Assessment 15 Jul 2026

Revit Skills Assessment 2026

21 staff across three teams sat a 60-question paper on 15 July 2026 (16:00–17:10), in five sections. The Modeling block is written per discipline; of the other 49 questions, 33 are identical across all papers and 16 swap in each discipline’s own component. Click any person or question to open the underlying answers.

64.4%
Company average
38.7 of 60 questions
21
Participants
3 teams · 100% turnout
50.8%
Weakest section
Family & Parameters
71.0%
Strongest section
Modeling
5.7 pts
Spread between teams
Gap sits inside teams

🎯 Team × Section Scoreboard

Percentage of questions answered correctly. Read down a column to find where the whole company is weak; read across a row for a team’s own profile.

Modeling
Documentation & Views
Collaboration & Coordination
Family & Parameters
Project Standards & Settings
Overall
Architecturen=10
72%
64%
70%
39%
70%
62%
Structuren=5
67%
71%
73%
67%
60%
68%
MEPn=6
73%
71%
57%
57%
61%
65%
Companyn=21
71%
68%
67%
51%
65%
64%
Weak Strong 30% → 90% correct

The Family & Parameters column is the lowest for all three teams — a company-wide gap, not one team’s problem.

🔎 Key Highlights

Score spread within each team

Each dot is one person; the solid tick is the team average; the dashed line is the company average. The three teams land close together, but each one stretches wide.

Architecturen=10
62%
Structuren=5
68%
MEPn=6
65%
20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

Where the company is losing points

Correct-answer rate across all 21 people by section. Four sections cluster together; Family & Parameters drops well below the rest.

Family & Parameters
50.8%
Project Standards & Settings
65.1%
Collaboration & Coordination
67.2%
Documentation & Views
67.7%
Modeling
71.0%
0%25%50%75%100%

🔬 Question breakdown

Every question, hardest first. Click a row to read the question and see exactly who picked which option. Where a paper words a question for its own discipline, each wording is a separate row — the paper column says which. The search box still matches on the question text.

Section
QSectionPaper Correct
Q6 Modeling MEP Electrical 0% 0/2
Q6 Modeling MEP D&P 0% 0/1
Q46 Family & Parameters all papers 0% 0/21
Q58 Project Standards & Settings Structure 0% 0/5
Q58 Project Standards & Settings MEP D&P, MEP Electrical 0% 0/3
Q44 Family & Parameters all papers 14% 3/21
Q6 Modeling Structure 20% 1/5
Q58 Project Standards & Settings Architect 20% 2/10
Q28 Documentation & Views all papers 24% 5/21
Q34 Collaboration & Coordination all papers 24% 5/21
Q21 Documentation & Views all papers 29% 6/21
Q42 Family & Parameters Architect 30% 3/10
Q42 Family & Parameters MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping 33% 2/6
Q37 Collaboration & Coordination MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping, Structure 36% 4/11
Q20 Documentation & Views all papers 38% 8/21
Q31 Collaboration & Coordination all papers 38% 8/21
Q1 Modeling Structure 40% 2/5
Q3 Modeling Structure 40% 2/5
Q42 Family & Parameters Structure 40% 2/5
Q48 Family & Parameters MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping, Architect 44% 7/16
Q41 Family & Parameters all papers 48% 10/21
Q43 Family & Parameters all papers 48% 10/21
Q50 Family & Parameters all papers 48% 10/21
Q60 Project Standards & Settings all papers 48% 10/21
Q1 Modeling MEP Electrical 50% 1/2
Q2 Modeling MEP D&P, MEP Piping 50% 2/4
Q3 Modeling MEP Electrical 50% 1/2
Q4 Modeling MEP Electrical 50% 1/2
Q5 Modeling MEP Electrical 50% 1/2
Q6 Modeling Architect 50% 5/10
Q8 Modeling MEP Electrical 50% 1/2
Q9 Modeling MEP Electrical 50% 1/2
Q11 Modeling Architect 50% 5/10
Q16 Documentation & Views MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping 50% 3/6
Q19 Documentation & Views MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping 50% 3/6
Q19 Documentation & Views Architect 50% 5/10
Q38 Collaboration & Coordination MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping, Architect 50% 8/16
Q53 Project Standards & Settings MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping 50% 3/6
Q56 Project Standards & Settings all papers 52% 11/21
Q13 Documentation & Views all papers 57% 12/21
Q15 Documentation & Views all papers 57% 12/21
Q30 Documentation & Views all papers 57% 12/21
Q1 Modeling Architect 60% 6/10
Q3 Modeling Architect 60% 6/10
Q5 Modeling Structure 60% 3/5
Q10 Modeling Structure 60% 3/5
Q10 Modeling Architect 60% 6/10
Q18 Documentation & Views Structure 60% 3/5
Q27 Documentation & Views Architect 60% 6/10
Q48 Family & Parameters Structure 60% 3/5
Q53 Project Standards & Settings Architect 60% 6/10
Q53 Project Standards & Settings Structure 60% 3/5
Q47 Family & Parameters all papers 62% 13/21
Q3 Modeling MEP Piping 67% 2/3
Q5 Modeling MEP Piping 67% 2/3
Q6 Modeling MEP Piping 67% 2/3
Q11 Modeling MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping 67% 4/6
Q18 Documentation & Views MEP Piping 67% 2/3
Q2 Modeling Architect 70% 7/10
Q9 Modeling Architect 70% 7/10
Q16 Documentation & Views Architect 70% 7/10
Q18 Documentation & Views Architect 70% 7/10
Q49 Family & Parameters Architect 70% 7/10
Q24 Documentation & Views all papers 71% 15/21
Q35 Collaboration & Coordination all papers 71% 15/21
Q40 Family & Parameters all papers 71% 15/21
Q51 Family & Parameters all papers 71% 15/21
Q27 Documentation & Views MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping, Structure 73% 8/11
Q8 Modeling MEP D&P, MEP Piping 75% 3/4
Q10 Modeling MEP D&P, MEP Piping 75% 3/4
Q12 Documentation & Views all papers 76% 16/21
Q52 Project Standards & Settings all papers 76% 16/21
Q57 Project Standards & Settings all papers 76% 16/21
Q59 Project Standards & Settings all papers 76% 16/21
Q4 Modeling Structure 80% 4/5
Q7 Modeling Structure 80% 4/5
Q8 Modeling Structure 80% 4/5
Q11 Modeling Structure 80% 4/5
Q16 Documentation & Views Structure 80% 4/5
Q29 Documentation & Views Architect 80% 8/10
Q29 Documentation & Views Structure 80% 4/5
Q37 Collaboration & Coordination Architect 80% 8/10
Q38 Collaboration & Coordination Structure 80% 4/5
Q45 Family & Parameters Architect 80% 8/10
Q45 Family & Parameters Structure 80% 4/5
Q54 Project Standards & Settings Structure 80% 4/5
Q54 Project Standards & Settings Architect 80% 8/10
Q23 Documentation & Views all papers 81% 17/21
Q36 Collaboration & Coordination all papers 81% 17/21
Q25 Documentation & Views MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping, Structure 82% 9/11
Q14 Documentation & Views MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping 83% 5/6
Q29 Documentation & Views MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping 83% 5/6
Q49 Family & Parameters MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping 83% 5/6
Q17 Documentation & Views all papers 86% 18/21
Q22 Documentation & Views all papers 86% 18/21
Q5 Modeling Architect 90% 9/10
Q7 Modeling Architect 90% 9/10
Q8 Modeling Architect 90% 9/10
Q14 Documentation & Views Architect 90% 9/10
Q25 Documentation & Views Architect 90% 9/10
Q33 Collaboration & Coordination all papers 90% 19/21
Q39 Collaboration & Coordination all papers 90% 19/21
Q55 Project Standards & Settings all papers 90% 19/21
Q32 Collaboration & Coordination all papers 95% 20/21
Q1 Modeling MEP Piping 100% 3/3
Q1 Modeling MEP D&P 100% 1/1
Q2 Modeling Structure 100% 5/5
Q2 Modeling MEP Electrical 100% 2/2
Q3 Modeling MEP D&P 100% 1/1
Q4 Modeling Architect 100% 10/10
Q4 Modeling MEP D&P, MEP Piping 100% 4/4
Q5 Modeling MEP D&P 100% 1/1
Q7 Modeling MEP Piping 100% 3/3
Q7 Modeling MEP D&P 100% 1/1
Q7 Modeling MEP Electrical 100% 2/2
Q9 Modeling MEP D&P, MEP Piping 100% 4/4
Q9 Modeling Structure 100% 5/5
Q10 Modeling MEP Electrical 100% 2/2
Q14 Documentation & Views Structure 100% 5/5
Q18 Documentation & Views MEP D&P 100% 1/1
Q18 Documentation & Views MEP Electrical 100% 2/2
Q19 Documentation & Views Structure 100% 5/5
Q26 Documentation & Views all papers 100% 21/21
Q45 Family & Parameters MEP D&P, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping 100% 6/6
Q49 Family & Parameters Structure 100% 5/5
Q54 Project Standards & Settings MEP Electrical 100% 2/2
Q54 Project Standards & Settings MEP D&P, MEP Piping 100% 4/4
Q58 Project Standards & Settings MEP Piping 100% 3/3

Self-assessment vs reality

Self-rating explains almost none of the real score (r = 0.37).

Actual score
MEP-03KC-01KT-06KC-04KT-05MEP-06 0%25%50%75%100% 246810
Self-rated Revit skill (1–10)

The diagonal is where self-rating equals the real score. Dots below it = overestimated.

Years of Revit vs score

The 5–10 year group does not outperform the 1–3 year group. Experience is accumulating as habit, not as depth in the tool.

1-3 yrsn=6
61%
3-5 yrsn=5
69%
5-10 yrsn=10
64%

Three people rated themselves 10/10 and scored 82%, 65% and 58%. The company’s top scorer rated himself 6/10.

Full scoreboard

Ranked by total score. Orange cells are sections below 50%. Click any row to open that person’s full answer sheet.

Team
#NameTeamPosition ScoreResult ModelingDocumentationCollaborationFamilyProject SelfTime
1 MEP-03🏆 Top MEP Architect/Engineer 51/60
85%
 91%89%100%58%89%662′
2 KC-01 Structure Drafter 49/60
82%
 91%84%89%75%67%1055′
3 KT-06 Architecture Architect/Engineer 49/60
82%
 82%95%67%75%78%944′
4 MEP-02 MEP Architect/Engineer 44/60
73%
 82%84%67%75%44%560′
5 KT-03 Architecture Architect/Engineer 44/60
73%
 91%68%78%50%89%659′
6 MEP-04 MEP Architect/Engineer 41/60
68%
 73%68%56%58%89%762′
7 KC-02 Structure Drafter 41/60
68%
 55%79%78%67%56%649′
8 KC-03 Structure Drafter 41/60
68%
 55%68%89%67%67%658′
9 KT-02 Architecture Architect/Engineer 41/60
68%
 100%68%78%42%56%562′
10 KC-04 Structure Drafter 39/60
65%
 82%58%67%75%44%1058′
11 KT-07 Architecture Architect/Engineer 39/60
65%
 73%63%89%42%67%747′
12 MEP-05 MEP Architect/Engineer 38/60
63%
 73%74%44%58%56%561′
13 MEP-01 MEP Architect/Engineer 36/60
60%
 73%63%44%58%56%362′
14 KT-05 Architecture Architect/Engineer 35/60
58%
 73%74%44%33%56%1052′
15 KT-04 Architecture Architect/Engineer 35/60
58%
 73%53%67%42%67%753′
16 KT-08 Architecture Architect/Engineer 35/60
58%
 55%68%56%33%78%862′
17 KC-05 Structure Drafter 34/60
57%
 55%63%44%50%67%751′
18 KT-01 Architecture Architect/Engineer 33/60
55%
 45%58%67%42%67%559′
19 KT-09 Architecture Architect/Engineer 33/60
55%
 64%47%89%25%67%762′
20 KT-10 Architecture Architect/Engineer 30/60
50%
 64%47%67%8%78%558′
21 MEP-06Needs support MEP Production Technical Assistant MEPF 24/60
40%
 45%47%33%33%33%358′
Method & excluded data

Source: five Microsoft Forms result files (Architect, Structure, MEP Ducting & Piping, MEP Electrical, MEP Piping) plus the "Getting To Know You" pre-survey. 60 questions, 1 point each.

Section mapping: Q1–11 Modeling (discipline-specific) · Q12–30 Documentation & Views · Q31–39 Collaboration & Coordination · Q40–51 Family & Parameters · Q52–60 Project Standards & Settings.

9 trial runs excluded — every one started before the 16:00 sitting and none appear in the pre-survey (admin and test accounts). The real sitting ran 16:00–17:10 on 15 Jul 2026; participants took 44–62 minutes.

MEP merges three sub-papers (Ducting & Piping, Electrical, Piping) since they are one team.

How comparable the papers are: Q1–11 (Modeling) are written separately for each discipline, so that block compares concepts rather than the same questions. Of the remaining 49 positions, 33 are word-for-word identical across all five papers and 16 are the same question with the discipline’s own component swapped in (a Wall for a duct, a beam for a conduit). The question breakdown lists each wording separately.

Correct answers are recovered, not read from a key. An option is shown as correct when someone who picked it was scored a point. That works for all but five wordings, where nobody who sat that paper answered correctly — Q46 is the notable one: all 21 people got it wrong, so its correct option cannot be recovered at all.

Two data-quality issues found in the papers themselves. (1) On Q60 the answer “eTransmit.” is scored 1 on the Architect, MEP Electrical and MEP Piping papers but 0 on the Structure paper — three Structure staff answered it correctly and were not credited. Scores here are left exactly as Microsoft Forms graded them, so Structure’s Project Standards figure is understated by up to 3 points. (2) Q54 and Q58 ask materially different things on different papers, so those two positions are not comparable across teams.

The Vietnamese half of each question is not shown. The Forms exports are Windows-1252 files, and every character outside that set was replaced with a literal “?” when the file was written, so the Vietnamese wording is destroyed in the source data and cannot be recovered. The same substitution hit the “→” arrows in 11 answer options, which now read “Analyze tab ? Check Systems panel ?”. Those are left exactly as exported rather than guessed at. Scores, names and the rest of the answer text are plain ASCII and unaffected.

Team colors match the Revit Addin Usage Report, so a team keeps the same hue across both reports.

Names are replaced by codes (KT / KC / MEP + number) on this shared copy. The code-to-name key is held separately.